Ranked by the Ace Matrix — a sharp grading system crafted by a veteran DFS grinder — blending K Upside, Run Prevention, Win Equity, Leverage, and Role/Pitch Count. This tool distills pitching data into one clear view, layering recent form and opponent splits so you can anchor cash builds and unlock contrarian GPP upside.

Updated August 17, 2025 — 6:29 PM ET

Quick Take

  • #1 Garrett Crochet – Ace 8.3, FD Salary $10,800, FPPG 43.04. 34% K-rate over the last 30 days with elite slider whiff%. Miami owns a 26% K-rate vs LHP, bottom-third OPS.
  • #2 Nathan Eovaldi – Ace 7.79, FD Salary $10,000, FPPG 36.6. 3.20 ERA with 6+ IP in 4 of last 5 starts. Toronto carries a 23% K-rate vs RHP and struggles vs splitters.
  • #3 Andrew Abbott – Ace 7.48, FD Salary $9,500, FPPG 31.85. 2.70 ERA across his last 4 starts. Milwaukee strikes out 25% vs LHP with a bottom-5 OPS.

#1 Garrett Crochet (LHP) — Matchup: MIA@BOS | Ace Matrix: 8.3

FD Salary
$10,800
FPPG
43.04

Component Score

K Upside
9.2
Run Prevention
8.3
Win Equity
8.1
Leverage
6.6
Role/Pitch Count
8.6

Recent: 34% K-rate over the last 30 days with elite slider whiff%.

Opp Splits: Miami owns a 26% K-rate vs LHP, bottom-third OPS.

DFS Upside: Slate-best raw K ceiling; Cash/GPP core if salary fits.

#2 Nathan Eovaldi (RHP) — Matchup: TEX@TOR | Ace Matrix: 7.79

FD Salary
$10,000
FPPG
36.6

Component Score

K Upside
8
Run Prevention
8
Win Equity
8.2
Leverage
6
Role/Pitch Count
8.5

Recent: 3.20 ERA with 6+ IP in 4 of last 5 starts.

Opp Splits: Toronto carries a 23% K-rate vs RHP and struggles vs splitters.

DFS Upside: High floor with 7–9 K path; premium SP1/2.

#3 Andrew Abbott (LHP) — Matchup: MIL@CIN | Ace Matrix: 7.48

FD Salary
$9,500
FPPG
31.85

Component Score

K Upside
7.5
Run Prevention
7.8
Win Equity
7.6
Leverage
6.5
Role/Pitch Count
7.8

Recent: 2.70 ERA across his last 4 starts.

Opp Splits: Milwaukee strikes out 25% vs LHP with a bottom-5 OPS.

DFS Upside: Mid-tier anchor; QS live with 6–8 K upside.

#4 Jose Berrios (RHP) — Matchup: TEX@TOR | Ace Matrix: 7.32

FD Salary
$8,800
FPPG
28.48

Component Score

K Upside
7
Run Prevention
7.8
Win Equity
7.8
Leverage
6.2
Role/Pitch Count
7.8

Recent: Curveball generating weak contact, QS in 3 straight.

Opp Splits: Texas expands the zone vs breaking balls, offering K upside.

DFS Upside: Cash-viable SP2; GPP ceiling if curve gets whiffs.

#5 Chris Paddack (RHP) — Matchup: DET@MIN | Ace Matrix: 7.05

FD Salary
$8,300
FPPG
20.95

Component Score

K Upside
7.2
Run Prevention
7
Win Equity
7.4
Leverage
6
Role/Pitch Count
7.6

Recent: Changeup consistency improving; fewer HRs allowed.

Opp Splits: Detroit K% still exploitable vs RHP despite rising power.

DFS Upside: Value SP2; fits balanced builds.

Ace Matrix Conclusion

The Ace Matrix highlights Garrett Crochet (FD $10,800, 43.04 FPPG) as the slate’s premier anchor. 34% K-rate over the last 30 days with elite slider whiff%. Miami owns a 26% K-rate vs LHP, bottom-third OPS.

Nathan Eovaldi (FD $10,000, 36.6 FPPG) offers stability with win equity and workload upside. 3.20 ERA with 6+ IP in 4 of last 5 starts. Toronto carries a 23% K-rate vs RHP and struggles vs splitters.

Andrew Abbott (FD $9,500, 31.85 FPPG) is the mid-tier GPP lever, capable of smashing if ownership fades. 2.70 ERA across his last 4 starts. Milwaukee strikes out 25% vs LHP with a bottom-5 OPS.

Overall, the Ace Matrix separates clear chalk anchors from leverage pivots. Lock elite K-rate arms in cash, and pivot mid-tier where ownership and matchup edges align in tournaments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *